ADAAmericans with Disabilities Act
The ADA standards for accessible design provide the baseline for clearances, reach ranges, circulation, and sanitary spaces. ILS adopts ADA technical specifications as the foundational layer of the evaluation grid.
The ILS methodology is built in three structural layers. The first two are public technical codes. The third is a proprietary residential framework. All three are applied to every certified project.
The ADA standards for accessible design provide the baseline for clearances, reach ranges, circulation, and sanitary spaces. ILS adopts ADA technical specifications as the foundational layer of the evaluation grid.
ISO 21542 is the international standard for accessibility and usability of the built environment. ILS aligns its criteria with ISO 21542 to ensure that certification holds technical equivalence across jurisdictions.
ANSI A117.1 provides additional technical depth for dwelling units, including detailed specification of operable parts, controls, and adaptable features. ILS uses A117.1 for granularity in residential criteria.
The international codes establish the technical baseline. Over them, ILS applies a proprietary residential framework that extends evaluation into areas the codes do not address directly: how spaces perform across the full life arc of an occupant, how a home adapts to events that arrive after handover, and how design choices made today affect asset value in two decades.
The framework was developed across two decades of field practice in residential evaluation, adaptation, and certification. It is the analytical layer that converts a code-compliant project into a long-term livability assessment.
The proprietary framework covers eight evaluation domains, each scored independently and consolidated into the ILS composite score:
Every certified project is evaluated against the published criteria for each of the eight domains. Findings are categorized as meeting, partially meeting, or not meeting each criterion. The criteria are weighted within their domain, and the domain scores combine into the ILS composite score.
The composite score determines the certification level. Silver, Gold, and Platinum thresholds are published and fixed. They are not adjusted per project. The level a project receives reflects measured performance against the standard at the time of evaluation.
Where a project falls short of a target level, the technical report identifies the gap explicitly. Where the gap can be closed through adjustment, the report specifies what would be required to reach the next level. The standard does not negotiate criteria.